linux-kernel - sizeof (struct tYpO *) : it is just a typo or rather a bug ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 24 Jul 2014 20:20:16 +0200
From:	Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@....de>
To:	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: sizeof (struct tYpO *) : it is just a typo or rather a bug ?

Inspired by this "typo" fix 
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1754640
I grep'ed the current git tree of linus for similar issues.

For these 4 places I'm wondering where the appropriate struct definition is located :

arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c:         sizeof(struct pci_devdev_info *)) {
tools/perf/builtin-sched.c:     sched->tasks = realloc(sched->tasks, sched->nr_tasks * sizeof(struct task_task *));
fs/ceph/xattr.c:                xattrs = kcalloc(numattr, sizeof(struct ceph_xattr *),
fs/ceph/xattr.c:                memset(xattrs, 0, numattr*sizeof(struct ceph_xattr *));

Nevertheless I was told, that gcc doesn't complain about such things due to eventually evaluating it to "sizeof(null)". I'm however curious if at least a warning should be emitted in such a case, or?

-- 
Toralf

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/