lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 25 Jul 2014 09:38:31 +0200
From:	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
To:	Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
	Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
CC:	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
	Andreas Olofsson <andreas@...pteva.com>,
	Matteo Vit <matteo.vit@...rwaredesign.com>,
	Sean Rickerd <srickerd@...e.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] ARM: dts: zynq: Update deprecated xuartps clock
 names

On 07/25/2014 01:24 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-07-25 at 01:13AM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 25.07.2014 01:09, schrieb Sören Brinkmann:
>>> On Fri, 2014-07-25 at 01:00AM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>>> Avoids deprecation warning messages.
>>>
>>> A patch that updates those names is already in armsoc.
>>
>> Which tree/branch should I base this series on then? It seemed the
>> Xilinx branches were all heavily outdated some days ago, so this is
>> against vanilla v3.16-rc6.

I have updated that branches. From my experience none is looking
at these branches and I mainly use them for communication
with arm-soc where sign tags are used which you can see them there.

> 
> That is something for the maintainers to answer. But in general, you're
> adding a lot of stuff that is not yet upstream, AFAIK. Some is still
> under review I think (like QSPI), others are just staged for the next
> merge window and parts are still in flight. Michal hopefully has a
> better overview.
> This particular patch can simply be omitted I think.

There are several options and I think the best is arm-soc tree
where you can see what have been accepted.
And also I believe all arm-soc trees are added to linux-next.

That's why I would use linux-next or arm-soc.

Thanks,
Michal

-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (264 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists