lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140725083519.GA2865@e104805>
Date:	Fri, 25 Jul 2014 09:35:19 +0100
From:	"Javi Merino" <javi.merino@....com>
To:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Cc:	"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: of: look for sensor driver parent node if
 device node missing

On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 09:22:00AM +0100, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> Thanks Rui.
> It seems I have put the wrong email-id for Eduardo (which I got from 
> get_maintainer) and the original patch not reached to Eduardo.
> 
> Do I need to re-post patch?
> 
> Thanks,
> Laxman
> 
> On Thursday 24 July 2014 08:45 PM, Zhang, Rui wrote:
> > Hi, Laxman,
> >
> > As Eduardo is the of thermal author and maintainer, I will take your patch only if you can get ACK from Eduardo.
> >
> > Eduardo,
> > Do you have any comments on this?

[Fixed Eduardo's email.]

> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Laxman Dewangan [mailto:ldewangan@...dia.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 5:49 PM
> >> To: Zhang, Rui; eduardo.valentin@...com
> >> Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: of: look for sensor driver parent node if
> >> device node missing
> >> Importance: High
> >>
> >> On Monday 14 July 2014 04:42 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> >>> There are some mfd devices which supports junction thermal interrupt
> >>> like ams,AS3722. The DT binding of these devices are defined as the
> >>> flat and drivers for sub module of such devices are registered as the
> >>> mfd_add_devices. In this method, the sub devices registered as
> >>> platform driver and these do not have the of_node pointer on their
> >>> device structure. In this case, use the parent of_node pointer to get
> >>> the required of_node pointer.
> >>>
> >> Any comment please?
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ