lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:21:27 +0200
From:	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
To:	Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Random panic in load_balance() with 3.16-rc

On 2014.07.25 at 18:03 +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 25.07.2014 17:15, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Can I ask anyone involved in this for preprocessed source and all gcc command
> >> line options to reproduce it, best in the form of a http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
> >> bugreport?
> > 
> > I've created bug 61904 for this:
> > 
> >   https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61904
> > 
> > Note that I don't personally have a reproducer (my machine has
> > gcc-4.8.3, and I don't see the same behavior), but I included the
> > incorrect fair.s file that Michel sent me (which has all the command
> > line options in it), and a pre-processed "fair.i" source file that I
> > generated and that *should* match the configuration that was the
> > source for that result. So there might be some version/configuration
> > skew there between the two files, but I think they match.
> 
> Thank you Linus for tracking down the problem and filing the bug report!
> I would have done the latter as well, but I could only have channeled
> your analysis anyway. :)
> 
> 
> > Holler if you cannot reproduce the problem based on that.
> 
> Likewise. I can create a GCC bugzilla account and add myself to the CC
> list if that helps.
> 
> FWIW though, the fair.i file you attached is basically identical to what
> I'm getting, the only difference being a handful of file path strings.

Unfortunately I cannot reproduce the issue. Please post your complete
compiler invocation while also adding -v to the options.

-- 
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists