[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53D23192.4000908@rock-chips.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 18:29:38 +0800
From: caesar <caesar.wang@...k-chips.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
CC: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] pwm: add this patch to support the new pwm of
Rockchip SoCs
Hi Thierry,
在 2014年07月21日 21:27, Thierry Reding 写道:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 08:58:42PM +0800, caesar wrote:
>> 于 2014年07月21日 16:50, Thierry Reding 写道:
>>> On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 08:55:29PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
> [...]
>>>> struct rockchip_pwm_chip *pc;
>>>> struct resource *r;
>>>> int ret;
>>>> @@ -119,7 +182,10 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>>> r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>>>> - pc->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r);
>>>> + if (!strcmp(of_id->compatible, "rockchip,vop-pwm"))
>>>> + pc->base = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, r->start, resource_size(r));
>>>> + else
>>>> + pc->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r);
>>> Sorry, this still isn't an option. You really shouldn't remap I/O
>>> regions that other drivers may be using. You hinted at a shared register
>>> space during the review of the initial version. Can you provide more
>>> detail about what exactly the memory map looks like of the rk3288? Is
>>> there some kind of technical reference manual that I could look at? Or
>>> do you have a device tree extract that shows what the memory map looks
>>> like?
>>>
>>> Thierry
>> Maybe,you can look at the ARM: dts: rk3288:
>> https://github.com/rkchrome/kernel/blob/master/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
>> There is some lcdc and vop-pwm map address for rk3288.
>>
>> ,and you can look at the vop-introduce.pdf and vop-register.pdf in Annex.
>>
>> Maybe,I should put the vop-pwm in lcdc driver,but I don't hope do so it.
>>
>> Could you give a suggestion to solve it? Thanks.
> It looks like you could turn the lcdc device into an MFD device so that
> it can instantiate two devices, one for the display controller, the
> other for the PWM. Or perhaps it would even work with only a single
> child device.
>
> The device tree would become something like this:
>
> lcdc@...30000 {
> compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-lcdc";
> ...
>
> pwm@...301a0 {
> compatible = "rockchip,vop-pwm";
> ...
> };
> };
>
> And your driver would do something like:
>
> static const struct resource pwm_resources[] = {
> {
> .start = 0x1a0,
> .end = 0x1af,
> .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
> },
> };
>
> static const struct mfd_cell subdevices[] = {
> {
> .name = "pwm",
> .id = 1,
> .of_compatible = "rockchip,vop-pwm",
> .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(pwm_resources),
> .resources = pwm_resources,
> },
> };
>
> static int lcdc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct resource *regs;
> ...
>
> regs = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>
> ...
>
> err = mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, 0, subdevices, ARRAY_SIZE(subdevices),
> regs, NULL, NULL);
> ...
> }
>
> Thierry
Sorry,I might a little trouble for the changes.
The driver changes only for lcdc? If that is the case,I suddenly don't
know how to do it ?
Maybe,I didn't say it clearly.
lcdc0: lcdc@...30000 | vop0pwm: pwm@...301a0
reg = <0xff930000 0x10000> | reg = <0xff9301a0 0x10>;
The lcdc has to add resource's address from 0xff930000 to 0xff93ffff.
When the pwm driver is loading vop0pwm. the "devm_ioremap_resource()"
will be used in probe();
I think it will be occur a fail. because the resource [mem
0xff9301a0-0xff9301af] has be requested by lcdc.
=>rockchip-pwm ff9301a0.pwm: can't request region for resource [mem
0xff9301a0-0xff9301af]
If I do the changes in pwm driver,do you have a other suggestion for
it? thanks.:-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists