linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: vt6655: tag data as _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140725115234.GZ25880@mwanda>
Date:	Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:52:34 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Guillaume Clement <gclement@...bob.org>
Cc:	Forest Bond <forest@...ttletooquiet.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vt6655: tag data as __user in struct
 tagSCmdRequest

On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 01:07:40AM +0200, Guillaume Clement wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6655/iwctl.c b/drivers/staging/vt6655/iwctl.c
> index 501cd64..9291259 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6655/iwctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6655/iwctl.c
> @@ -1621,14 +1621,17 @@ int iwctl_giwauth(struct net_device *dev,
>  int iwctl_siwgenie(struct net_device *dev,
>  		   struct iw_request_info *info,
>  		   struct iw_point *wrq,
> -		   char *extra)
> +		   char __user *extra)
>  {
>  	PSDevice			pDevice = (PSDevice)netdev_priv(dev);
>  	PSMgmtObject	pMgmt = &(pDevice->sMgmtObj);
>  	int ret = 0;
> +	char length;
>  
>  	if (wrq->length) {
> -		if ((wrq->length < 2) || (extra[1]+2 != wrq->length)) {
> +		if (get_user(length, extra + 1))
> +			return -EFAULT;
> +		if ((wrq->length < 2) || (length != wrq->length)) {
>  			ret = -EINVAL;
>  			goto out;
>  		}

Wow, this is confusing code.  The patch description isn't clear enough
that this is a bugfix patch and not just a "tag data" patch.

I don't think this is correct.  We need to check the length of the input
buffer before we call get_user().  Can we return directly or do we
*need* to go to the mysteriously named "out"?  Also the + 2 is lost,
this would break everything if the current code works (not necessarily a
valid assumption).  Delete all my comments in the final code.

	/* 2 because we skip the first byte and read length from the
	   second byte */
	if (wrq->length < 2) {
		ret = -EINVAL;
		goto out;
	}

	ret = get_user(length, extra + 1);
	if (ret)
		goto out;

	if (length + 2 != wrq->length) {
		ret = -EINVAL;
		goto out;
	}

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/