[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140725122933.GA10819@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:29:33 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 06/15] mm, compaction: reduce zone checking frequency
in the migration scanner
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:48:14PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> The unification of the migrate and free scanner families of function has
> highlighted a difference in how the scanners ensure they only isolate pages
> of the intended zone. This is important for taking zone lock or lru lock of
> the correct zone. Due to nodes overlapping, it is however possible to
> encounter a different zone within the range of the zone being compacted.
>
> The free scanner, since its inception by commit 748446bb6b ("mm: compaction:
> memory compaction core"), has been checking the zone of the first valid page
> in a pageblock, and skipping the whole pageblock if the zone does not match.
>
> This checking was completely missing from the migration scanner at first, and
> later added by commit dc9086004b ("mm: compaction: check for overlapping
> nodes during isolation for migration") in a reaction to a bug report.
> But the zone comparison in migration scanner is done once per a single scanned
> page, which is more defensive and thus more costly than a check per pageblock.
>
> This patch unifies the checking done in both scanners to once per pageblock,
> through a new pageblock_within_zone() function, which also includes pfn_valid()
> checks. It is more defensive than the current free scanner checks, as it checks
> both the first and last page of the pageblock, but less defensive by the
> migration scanner per-page checks. It assumes that node overlapping may result
> (on some architecture) in a boundary between two nodes falling into the middle
> of a pageblock, but that there cannot be a node0 node1 node0 interleaving
> within a single pageblock.
>
> The result is more code being shared and a bit less per-page CPU cost in the
> migration scanner.
>
> Reported-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists