[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140725124459.GM20603@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:44:59 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Kaushal Kumar <kaushalk@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Arun Bharadwaj <abharadw@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Remove synchronize rcu/sched calls from _cpu_down
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 05:26:08PM +0530, Kaushal Kumar wrote:
> synchronize_rcu calls fail hot-unplug latency tests since
> wait_rcu_gp can have very high latency, at times up to few
> hundred of millisecs.
So bloody what?
> These calls were earlier removed for the same reason by the
> commit 9ee349ad6d326df3633d43f54202427295999c47, but got added
> back as part of commit c4575f83b9fe87bb57b737bc8a667f746a20320a.
fatal: bad object c4575f83b9fe87bb57b737bc8a667f746a20320
> Moreover there should be no need for sync_sched() in _cpu_down
> as stop_machine() provides that barrier implicitly.
We should not rely on that, but also you've removed synchronize_rcu()
and this is not at all provided by stop_machine().
So NAK.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists