lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:52:57 -0700
From:	Zach Brown <>
To:	Abhijith Das <>
	linux-fsdevel <>,
	cluster-devel <>
Subject: Re: [RFC] readdirplus implementations: xgetdents vs dirreadahead

On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 01:37:19PM -0400, Abhijith Das wrote:
> Hi all,
> The topic of a readdirplus-like syscall had come up for discussion at last year's
> LSF/MM collab summit. I wrote a couple of syscalls with their GFS2 implementations
> to get at a directory's entries as well as stat() info on the individual inodes.
> I'm presenting these patches and some early test results on a single-node GFS2
> filesystem.
> 1. dirreadahead() - This patchset is very simple compared to the xgetdents() system
> call below and scales very well for large directories in GFS2. dirreadahead() is
> designed to be called prior to getdents+stat operations.

Hmm.  Have you tried plumbing these read-ahead calls in under the normal
getdents() syscalls?

We don't have a filereadahead() syscall and yet we somehow manage to
implement buffered file data read-ahead :).

- z
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists