linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: filter: rename 'struct sk_filter' to 'struct bpf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMEtUuz-w-38PRFP4PoKg5XzL3F=VsVKu-6Z93cnEvhyk2c8dw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 25 Jul 2014 12:02:11 -0700
From:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To:	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Cc:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: filter: rename 'struct sk_filter' to
 'struct bpf_prog'

On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com> wrote:
>>>>>> This follows a convention in include/uapi/linux/netfilter/*.h that
>>>>>> likely predates the introduction of uapi. A search for "Used
>>>>>> internally by the kernel" shows many more examples. I should not have
>>>>>> included filter.h, however. The common behavior when using pointers
>>>>>> to kernel-internal structures is to have a forward declaration. I suggest
>>>>>> making that change, instead of changing to void *. This avoids having
>>>>>> to add casts where xt_bpf_info is used in net/netfilter/xt_bpf.c:
>>>>>
>>>>> that will not avoid typecast.
>>>>> Either 'void *' approach or extra 'struct sk_filter;' approach, both need
>>>>> type casts to 'struct bpf_prog' in xt_bpf.c
>>>>> (because of SK_RUN_FILTER macro)
>>>>> Therefore I prefer extra 'struct sk_filter;' approach.
>>>>
>>>> I hadn't noticed that your patch makes the same change that I
>>>> proposed. Nothing in userspace should touch that pointer, so it is
>>>> fine to change its type to struct bpf_prog* at the same time. No need
>>>> for typecasts.
>>>
>>> really? I don't think it's a good idea to expose kernel struct type
>>> to user space. How is it even going to compile?
>>
>> a forward declaration.
>>
>>> #include <linux/filter.h> brings different files in kernel and in user space.
>>> struct bpf_prog is undefined in user space and compiler will complain.
>>> Adding 'struct bpf_prog;' will be ugly.
>>> imo the lesser evil is adding 'struct sk_filter;' and doing type casts
>>> in kernel.
>>
>> but the exact same argument applies to sk_filter. If that struct is
>> renamed everywhere else, then the result will only be more confusing.
>> A forward declaration is the standard workaround to all such cases in
>> include/uapi/linux/netfilter. See for instance xt_connlimit.h. This is
>> sufficient to allow userspace build to succeed, without exposing any
>> kernel structure detail. If you don't even want to leak the name, then
>> let's make it void *. Keeping a declaration for sk_filter, while
>> sk_filter is renamed everywhere else is the least good option, in my
>> opinion.
>
> well, since you the author of this bit and you're ok with 'void *', I'm ok
> with it too :) Just typecast in kernel is still needed because of
> SK_RUN_FILTER() macro...

just tried with 'void *', actually all three type casts are needed...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/