[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53D2AB54.5030809@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 12:09:08 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] drivers: base: add new class "cpu" to group cpu
devices
On 07/25/14 09:44, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
>
> This patch creates a new class called "cpu" and assigns it to all the
> cpu devices. This helps in grouping all the cpu devices and associated
> child devices under the same class.
>
> This patch also:
> 1. modifies the get_parent_device to return the legacy path
> (/sys/devices/system/cpu/..) for the cpu class devices to support
> existing sysfs ABI
> 2. avoids creating link in the class directory pointing to the device as
> there would be per-cpu instance of these devices with the same name
> 3. makes sure subsystem symlink continues pointing to cpu bus instead of
> cpu class for cpu devices
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Why can't we make a 'cache' bus that the cache devices hang off of? It
doesn't make sense to me why we would want to have cache devices living
on the cpu bus.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists