linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] crypto: Add Allwinner Security System crypto accelerator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53D3B4B6.3000100@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 26 Jul 2014 16:01:26 +0200
From:	Corentin LABBE <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC:	robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
	rdunlap@...radead.org, maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, davem@...emloft.net,
	grant.likely@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] crypto: Add Allwinner Security System crypto accelerator

Le 24/07/2014 15:38, Herbert Xu a écrit :
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 01:04:55PM +0200, Corentin LABBE wrote:
>> Le 24/07/2014 08:00, Herbert Xu a écrit :
>>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 02:59:13PM +0200, LABBE Corentin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +/* sunxi_hash_init: initialize request context
>>>> + * Activate the SS, and configure it for MD5 or SHA1
>>>> + */
>>>> +int sunxi_hash_init(struct ahash_request *areq)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	const char *hash_type;
>>>> +	struct crypto_ahash *tfm = crypto_ahash_reqtfm(areq);
>>>> +	struct sunxi_req_ctx *op = crypto_ahash_ctx(tfm);
>>>> +
>>>> +	mutex_lock(&ss->lock);
>>>> +
>>>> +	hash_type = crypto_tfm_alg_name(areq->base.tfm);
>>>> +
>>>> +	op->byte_count = 0;
>>>> +	op->nbwait = 0;
>>>> +	op->waitbuf = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +	/* Enable and configure SS for MD5 or SHA1 */
>>>> +	if (strcmp(hash_type, "sha1") == 0)
>>>> +		op->mode = SS_OP_SHA1;
>>>> +	else
>>>> +		op->mode = SS_OP_MD5;
>>>> +
>>>> +	writel(op->mode | SS_ENABLED, ss->base + SS_CTL);
>>>> +	return 0;
>>>
>>> The hash driver is completely broken.  You are modifying tfm
>>> ctx data which is shared by all users of a single tfm.  So
>>> if two users conduct hashes in parallel they will step all
>>> over each other.
>>
>> So where can I store data for each request ?
> 
> Well, first of all you need to stop storing state in the hardware.
> After each operation the hardware may be used by some other user
> for a completely different hash request.  So leaving the hash state
> in the hardware is a no-no.
> 
> If your hardware supports exporting the hash state then you just
> have to export it after each operation and reimporting before the
> next one.

Even if it is undocumented, the hardware seems to support it.
Since crypto_ahash_ctx is for a tfm, does ahash_request_ctx is the good place to store data ?
(after a call to crypto_ahash_set_reqsize in cra_init)

I have also seen export/import function, does I need to use it ?


> 
> If your hardware is incapable of exporting partial hash state then
> you will have to use a software fallback for init/update.  If your
> hardware is incapable of importing partial hash state then you will
> also have to do finup/final using a software fallback.
> 
> Cheers,
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/