[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140726190224.229400902@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:01:35 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Anand Avati <avati@...hat.com>,
Niels de Vos <ndevos@...hat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.15 013/109] fuse: ignore entry-timeout on LOOKUP_REVAL
3.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Anand Avati <avati@...hat.com>
commit 154210ccb3a871e631bf39fdeb7a8731d98af87b upstream.
The following test case demonstrates the bug:
sh# mount -t glusterfs localhost:meta-test /mnt/one
sh# mount -t glusterfs localhost:meta-test /mnt/two
sh# echo stuff > /mnt/one/file; rm -f /mnt/two/file; echo stuff > /mnt/one/file
bash: /mnt/one/file: Stale file handle
sh# echo stuff > /mnt/one/file; rm -f /mnt/two/file; sleep 1; echo stuff > /mnt/one/file
On the second open() on /mnt/one, FUSE would have used the old
nodeid (file handle) trying to re-open it. Gluster is returning
-ESTALE. The ESTALE propagates back to namei.c:filename_lookup()
where lookup is re-attempted with LOOKUP_REVAL. The right
behavior now, would be for FUSE to ignore the entry-timeout and
and do the up-call revalidation. Instead FUSE is ignoring
LOOKUP_REVAL, succeeding the revalidation (because entry-timeout
has not passed), and open() is again retried on the old file
handle and finally the ESTALE is going back to the application.
Fix: if revalidation is happening with LOOKUP_REVAL, then ignore
entry-timeout and always do the up-call.
Signed-off-by: Anand Avati <avati@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/fuse/dir.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/fuse/dir.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dir.c
@@ -198,7 +198,8 @@ static int fuse_dentry_revalidate(struct
inode = ACCESS_ONCE(entry->d_inode);
if (inode && is_bad_inode(inode))
goto invalid;
- else if (time_before64(fuse_dentry_time(entry), get_jiffies_64())) {
+ else if (time_before64(fuse_dentry_time(entry), get_jiffies_64()) ||
+ (flags & LOOKUP_REVAL)) {
int err;
struct fuse_entry_out outarg;
struct fuse_req *req;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists