[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140726190200.578964582@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:02:09 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Dmitry Popov <ixaphire@...tor.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 16/56] ip_tunnel: fix ip_tunnel_lookup
3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Dmitry Popov <ixaphire@...tor.net>
[ Upstream commit e0056593b61253f1a8a9941dacda22e73b963cdc ]
This patch fixes 3 similar bugs where incoming packets might be routed into
wrong non-wildcard tunnels:
1) Consider the following setup:
ip address add 1.1.1.1/24 dev eth0
ip address add 1.1.1.2/24 dev eth0
ip tunnel add ipip1 remote 2.2.2.2 local 1.1.1.1 mode ipip dev eth0
ip link set ipip1 up
Incoming ipip packets from 2.2.2.2 were routed into ipip1 even if it has dst =
1.1.1.2. Moreover even if there was wildcard tunnel like
ip tunnel add ipip0 remote 2.2.2.2 local any mode ipip dev eth0
but it was created before explicit one (with local 1.1.1.1), incoming ipip
packets with src = 2.2.2.2 and dst = 1.1.1.2 were still routed into ipip1.
Same issue existed with all tunnels that use ip_tunnel_lookup (gre, vti)
2) ip address add 1.1.1.1/24 dev eth0
ip tunnel add ipip1 remote 2.2.146.85 local 1.1.1.1 mode ipip dev eth0
ip link set ipip1 up
Incoming ipip packets with dst = 1.1.1.1 were routed into ipip1, no matter what
src address is. Any remote ip address which has ip_tunnel_hash = 0 raised this
issue, 2.2.146.85 is just an example, there are more than 4 million of them.
And again, wildcard tunnel like
ip tunnel add ipip0 remote any local 1.1.1.1 mode ipip dev eth0
wouldn't be ever matched if it was created before explicit tunnel like above.
Gre & vti tunnels had the same issue.
3) ip address add 1.1.1.1/24 dev eth0
ip tunnel add gre1 remote 2.2.146.84 local 1.1.1.1 key 1 mode gre dev eth0
ip link set gre1 up
Any incoming gre packet with key = 1 were routed into gre1, no matter what
src/dst addresses are. Any remote ip address which has ip_tunnel_hash = 0 raised
the issue, 2.2.146.84 is just an example, there are more than 4 million of them.
Wildcard tunnel like
ip tunnel add gre2 remote any local any key 1 mode gre dev eth0
wouldn't be ever matched if it was created before explicit tunnel like above.
All this stuff happened because while looking for a wildcard tunnel we didn't
check that matched tunnel is a wildcard one. Fixed.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Popov <ixaphire@...tor.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c
@@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ struct ip_tunnel *ip_tunnel_lookup(struc
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(t, head, hash_node) {
if (remote != t->parms.iph.daddr ||
+ t->parms.iph.saddr != 0 ||
!(t->dev->flags & IFF_UP))
continue;
@@ -182,10 +183,11 @@ struct ip_tunnel *ip_tunnel_lookup(struc
head = &itn->tunnels[hash];
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(t, head, hash_node) {
- if ((local != t->parms.iph.saddr &&
- (local != t->parms.iph.daddr ||
- !ipv4_is_multicast(local))) ||
- !(t->dev->flags & IFF_UP))
+ if ((local != t->parms.iph.saddr || t->parms.iph.daddr != 0) &&
+ (local != t->parms.iph.daddr || !ipv4_is_multicast(local)))
+ continue;
+
+ if (!(t->dev->flags & IFF_UP))
continue;
if (!ip_tunnel_key_match(&t->parms, flags, key))
@@ -202,6 +204,8 @@ struct ip_tunnel *ip_tunnel_lookup(struc
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(t, head, hash_node) {
if (t->parms.i_key != key ||
+ t->parms.iph.saddr != 0 ||
+ t->parms.iph.daddr != 0 ||
!(t->dev->flags & IFF_UP))
continue;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists