[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53D36A51.1050000@web.de>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 10:44:01 +0200
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>
To: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>, gleb@...nel.org,
mtosatti@...hat.com, nadav.amit@...il.com
CC: kvm@...r.kernel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] kvm, mem-hotplug: Reload L1's apic access page
if it is migrated when L2 is running.
On 2014-07-23 21:42, Tang Chen wrote:
> This patch only handle "L1 and L2 vm share one apic access page" situation.
>
> When L1 vm is running, if the shared apic access page is migrated, mmu_notifier will
> request all vcpus to exit to L0, and reload apic access page physical address for
> all the vcpus' vmcs (which is done by patch 5/6). And when it enters L2 vm, L2's vmcs
> will be updated in prepare_vmcs02() called by nested_vm_run(). So we need to do
> nothing.
>
> When L2 vm is running, if the shared apic access page is migrated, mmu_notifier will
> request all vcpus to exit to L0, and reload apic access page physical address for
> all L2 vmcs. And this patch requests apic access page reload in L2->L1 vmexit.
Shouldn't this patch come before we allow apic access page migration?
Jan
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (264 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists