linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: ft1000: fix some checkpatch complaints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 27 Jul 2014 10:35:38 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Nicolas Thery <nthery@...il.com>, marek.belisko@...il.com,
	me@...o.io, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: ft1000: fix some checkpatch complaints

On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:23:53AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-07-27 at 19:08 +0200, Nicolas Thery wrote:
> > This patch fixes the following errors and warnings:
> []
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-pcmcia/ft1000_proc.c b/drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-pcmcia/ft1000_proc.c
> []
> > @@ -23,34 +23,38 @@
> []
> > -#define seq_putx(m, message, size, var) \
> > +#define seq_putx(m, message, size, var) do { \
> >  	seq_printf(m, message);	\
> >  	for (i = 0; i < (size - 1); i++) { \
> >  		seq_printf(m, "%02x:", var[i]); \
> >  	} \
> > -	seq_printf(m, "%02x\n", var[i])
> > +	seq_printf(m, "%02x\n", var[i]); \
> > +} while (0)
> 
> Ideally, these wouldn't depend on an external
> i variable.
> 
> Maybe something like:
> 
> #define seq_putx(m, message, size, var) \
> do { \
> 	int _i; \
>  	seq_printf(m, message);	\
>  	for (_i = 0; _i < (size - 1); _i++) \
>  		seq_printf(m, "%02x:", var[_i]); \
> 	seq_printf(m, "%02x\n", var[_i]); \
> } while (0)
>  
> > -#define seq_putd(m, message, size, var) \
> > +#define seq_putd(m, message, size, var) do { \
> >  	seq_printf(m, message); \
> >  	for (i = 0; i < (size - 1); i++) { \
> >  		seq_printf(m, "%d.", var[i]); \
> >  	} \
> > -	seq_printf(m, "%d\n", var[i])
> > +	seq_printf(m, "%d\n", var[i]); \
> > +} while (0)
> 
> Maybe later change these to use the recently introduced
> seq_hex_dump: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/11/269
> 

How about removing the proc files entirely, as I doubt they are really
needed :)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/