linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2 3/3] [SCSI] Make LBP quirk skip lbpme checks tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 27 Jul 2014 02:09:27 +0000
From:	KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
To:	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC:	Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...il.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	"ohering@...e.com" <ohering@...e.com>,
	"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
	"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
	"jbottomley@...allels.com" <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 3/3] [SCSI] Make LBP quirk skip lbpme checks tests



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin K. Petersen [mailto:martin.petersen@...cle.com]
> Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 12:25 PM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: Martin K. Petersen; Sitsofe Wheeler; Christoph Hellwig;
> gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> devel@...uxdriverproject.org; ohering@...e.com; apw@...onical.com;
> jasowang@...hat.com; jbottomley@...allels.com; linux-
> scsi@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] [SCSI] Make LBP quirk skip lbpme checks tests
> 
> >>>>> "KY" == KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com> writes:
> 
> >> Great! I'd just like to have a reasonable level of confidence in
> >> what's happening down the stack before I entertain turning something
> >> on that's not being properly advertised.
> 
> KY> As I look at the output of inquiry between Linux on Hyper-V and
> KY> native Linux, is not specifying conformance level the main issue?
> 
> The main problem for this particular use case (aside from the issue we've
> already addressed) is that the passthrough device (SATA SSD) has
> LBPME=0 in the READ CAPACITY(16) response. The LBP VPD is correctly
> provided with LBPU flag set but because LBPME is reported as disabled we
> will not attempt to issue UNMAP commands to the device.

Oh; ok. I missed the read_capacity response.

Thanks,

K. Y
> 
> --
> Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/