[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140728000115.GB23367@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 08:01:15 +0800
From: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pjt@...gle.com, bsegall@...gle.com,
arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com, len.brown@...el.com,
rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, alan.cox@...el.com,
mark.gross@...el.com, fengguang.wu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 v4] sched: Rewrite per entity runnable load average
tracking
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 09:49:18AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-07-28 at 03:34 +0800, Yuyang Du wrote:
> > Thanks a lot, Mike.
> >
> > Ben asked for this test, but actually I don't know how to get pipe-test, still
> > not even after google it.
>
> You could write it trivially, it's just pipe ping-pong. I can send you
> a copy of the one I use if you like. Ingo wrote it way back in the dark
> ages, I use it to watch out for fastpath lard accumulation.
Yes, please, drop me a copy.
> > So the result is flat compared to before or a pass?
>
> Yeah, my little box said it was a deep cgroup price noop, but a modest
> win for root. I love minus signs, they work great, though sometimes in
> highly mysterious ways :)
>
Minus sign is great, and I hope this patchset is not mysterious, :)
Thanks,
Yuyang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists