[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53D611EC.2000907@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 17:03:40 +0800
From: "xinhui.pan" <xinhuix.pan@...el.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
mnipxh <mnipxh@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty/n_gsm.c: fix a memory leak in gsmld_open
Hi, Jiri
于 2014年07月28日 16:49, Jiri Slaby 写道:
> On 07/28/2014 10:14 AM, xinhui.pan wrote:
>> If gsmld_attach_gsm fails, the gsm is not used anymore.
>> tty core will not call gsmld_close to do the cleanup work.
>> tty core just restore to the tty old ldisc.
>> That always causes memory leak.
>
> Nice catch!
>
>> --- a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
>> @@ -2382,7 +2383,13 @@ static int gsmld_open(struct tty_struct *tty)
>>
>> /* Attach the initial passive connection */
>> gsm->encoding = 1;
>> - return gsmld_attach_gsm(tty, gsm);
>> +
>> + ret = gsmld_attach_gsm(tty, gsm);
>> + if (ret != 0) {
>> + gsm_cleanup_mux(gsm);
>> + mux_put(gsm);
>
> It is quite illogical to put the mux here. It should be in gsmld_open.
> I.e. gsm_cleanup_mux here, mux_put there.
>
Thanks for your reply :)
But I am a little confused with your comments, could you explain it when you are free?
Sorry for my poor English.
thanks,
xinhui
> thanks,
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists