[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140728141137.GF12073@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 10:11:37 -0400
From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
=?UTF-8?Q?Michel_D=C3=A4nzer?=
<michel@...nzer.net>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Debian GCC Maintainers <debian-gcc@...ts.debian.org>,
Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Random panic in load_balance() with 3.16-rc
Hi -
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 09:10:04AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> [...]
> I thought Markus told us that -fno-var-tracking-assignments makes
> absolutely no difference for non-debug kernels?
It does affect CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO kernels, and that config option is
set for all Red Hat kernels (-debug or plain).
> [...] Is there some equivalent signalling system that gcc could use
> [...]
I'm not aware of anything trivial like a gcc --report-fixed-PRs kind
of thing. But, kbuild could conceivably have a run-time test
involving test-running gcc with in that compare-debug mode with a
suitable test case. We use the latter technique in systemtap for
auto-configuring to kernel versions/features; we got the $(CHECK_BUILD)
trick from vmware module makefiles. It could be recast as a variant
of $(cc-option ...).
- FChE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists