[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1406524724-17946-3-git-send-email-davidlohr@hp.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 22:18:40 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
To: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org
Cc: jason.low2@...com, davidlohr@...com, aswin@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -tip/master 3/7] locking/mcs: Remove obsolete comment
... as we clearly inline mcs_spin_lock() now.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
---
kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
index 23e89c5..4d60986 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
@@ -56,9 +56,6 @@ do { \
* If the lock has already been acquired, then this will proceed to spin
* on this node->locked until the previous lock holder sets the node->locked
* in mcs_spin_unlock().
- *
- * We don't inline mcs_spin_lock() so that perf can correctly account for the
- * time spent in this lock function.
*/
static inline
void mcs_spin_lock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists