[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8738dm9t4z.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:19:56 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Sergey Oboguev <oboguev.public@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, khalid.aziz@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] sched: deferred set priority (dprio)
Sergey Oboguev <oboguev.public@...il.com> writes:
> [This is a repost of the message from few day ago, with patch file
> inline instead of being pointed by the URL.]
Have you checked out the preemption control that was posted some time
ago? It did essentially the same thing, but somewhat simpler than your
patch.
http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1403.0/00780.html
Yes I agree with you that lock preemption is a serious issue that needs solving.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists