linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Two-phase seccomp and x86 tracing changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLjmHczeQiJN1Q+aGQKn_B+08FEXHWxjku6QedkGDhDTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:42:34 -0700
From:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux MIPS Mailing List <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
	Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Two-phase seccomp and x86 tracing changes

On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 4:34 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 07/28/2014 04:29 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:59 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>>> On 07/23/2014 12:20 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It looks like patches 1-4 have landed here:
>>>>
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git/log/?h=seccomp/fastpath
>>>>
>>>> hpa, what's the route forward for the x86 part?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I guess I should discuss this with Kees to figure out what makes most
>>> sense.  In the meantime, could you address Oleg's question?
>>
>> Since the x86 parts depend on the seccomp parts, I'm happy if you
>> carry them instead of having them land from my tree. Otherwise I'm
>> open to how to coordinate timing.
>>
>
> You mean for me to carry the seccomp part as well?

If that makes sense as far as the coordination, that's fine with me.
Otherwise I'm not sure how x86 can build without having the seccomp
changes in your tree.

-Kees


-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/