[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53D75B34.6030403@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 11:28:36 +0300
From: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
"mturquette@...aro.org" <mturquette@...aro.org>,
"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] ARM: tegra: Remove TEGRA124_CLK_EMC from tegra124-car.h
Yeah, I'll drop this one.
- Mikko
On 22/07/14 01:37, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 07/11/2014 08:18 AM, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
>> Remove the TEGRA124_CLK_EMC cell value define for tegra124-car
>> from the binding headers. This clock has never been able to do
>> anything and is being replaced with a separate EMC driver with
>> its own device tree node. Removing the define ensures that any
>> user will not mistakenly refer to <&tegra_car TEGRA124_CLK_EMC>
>> instead of <&emc> or similar.
>
> If the clock physically exists in HW, I see no reason to remove it from
> the binding definition, even if we don't implement it (or remove the
> implementation of it) in the Linux clock driver.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists