[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1407290213420.13227@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 02:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...r.kernel.org,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/14] mm, compaction: khugepaged should not give up
due to need_resched()
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> Hmm, if thp faults want to pay cost as least as possible, how about
> making thp faults skip async/sync compaction at all?
>
You can certainly do that with /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/defrag.
Without doing memory compaction, though, at least one of my customers will
have their thp ratio drop significantly and for the vast majority of our
machines minimal compaction is all that is needed to allocate a hugepage.
I'm concerned primarily about the straggler that has very lengthy fault
times for even single hugepages.
This patchset will address some of those concerns, but I agree with you
that we should be terminating async compaction with another heuristic
rather than need_resched().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists