linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 03/14] mm, compaction: do not count compact

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Jul 2014 17:04:36 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm:;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/14] mm, compaction: do not count compact_stall if
 all zones skipped compaction

On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Vlastimil Babka wrote:

> The compact_stall vmstat counter counts the number of allocations stalled by
> direct compaction. It does not count when all attempted zones had deferred
> compaction, but it does count when all zones skipped compaction. The skipping
> is decided based on very early check of compaction_suitable(), based on
> watermarks and memory fragmentation. Therefore it makes sense not to count
> skipped compactions as stalls. Moreover, compact_success or compact_fail is
> also already not being counted when compaction was skipped, so this patch
> changes the compact_stall counting to match the other two.
> 
> Additionally, restructure __alloc_pages_direct_compact() code for better
> readability.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
> Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>

Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>

This makes the second patch in the series more understandable but I still 
renew my suggestion that you should be doing the following as part of the 
second patch.
---
diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_compact_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
 	int may_perform_io = gfp_mask & __GFP_IO;
 	struct zoneref *z;
 	struct zone *zone;
-	int rc = COMPACT_DEFERRED;
+	int rc = COMPACT_SKIPPED;
 	int alloc_flags = 0;
 
 	/* Check if the GFP flags allow compaction */
@@ -1147,6 +1147,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_compact_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
 	if (allocflags_to_migratetype(gfp_mask) == MIGRATE_MOVABLE)
 		alloc_flags |= ALLOC_CMA;
 #endif
+	rc = COMPACT_DEFERRED;
 	/* Compact each zone in the list */
 	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist, high_zoneidx,
 								nodemask) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/