[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140729121753.GZ3935@laptop>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 14:17:53 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] nohz: Switch nohz full timekeeper to dynticks idle
on top of sysidle detection
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 07:37:35PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> @@ -745,7 +747,7 @@ static bool can_stop_idle_tick(int cpu, struct tick_sched *ts)
> * if there are full dynticks CPUs around
> */
> if (tick_do_timer_cpu == cpu)
> - return false;
> + return rcu_sys_is_idle();
> }
I still feel its entirely upside down to rely on RCU for this...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists