lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:48:29 +0200
From:	Tomas Henzl <>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <>
CC:	Alexander Gordeev <>,,,,,,
	Suresh Thiagarajan <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 17/23] pm8001: Fix invalid return when request_irq()

On 07/29/2014 03:20 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 03:13:06PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
>> Hi, 
>> patch looks good.
>> A correction in pm8001_request_irq might be added too to allow 
>> the INT-X path when pm8001_setup_msix fails, but that is not part 
>> of this fix.
> There's actually an equivalent fix already in through one of the
> previous pm8001 updates, so I skipped this one even if it already had an
> ACK.  The following pm8001 applied just fine, though.  Take a look, as
> I've already pushed out the updated drivers branch.

I'm a bit confused - you were not commenting my text above I think?

I see in drivers-for-3.17 this patch already applied 5607de7
but not yet the next one (18/23) which also has a review, is there another ack needed?

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to
> More majordomo info at

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists