lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:48:29 +0200 From: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@...hat.com> To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> CC: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xjtuwjp@...il.com, lindar_liu@...sh.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Suresh Thiagarajan <Suresh.Thiagarajan@...s.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 17/23] pm8001: Fix invalid return when request_irq() failed On 07/29/2014 03:20 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 03:13:06PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote: >> Hi, >> patch looks good. >> >> A correction in pm8001_request_irq might be added too to allow >> the INT-X path when pm8001_setup_msix fails, but that is not part >> of this fix. > > There's actually an equivalent fix already in through one of the > previous pm8001 updates, so I skipped this one even if it already had an > ACK. The following pm8001 applied just fine, though. Take a look, as > I've already pushed out the updated drivers branch. I'm a bit confused - you were not commenting my text above I think? I see in drivers-for-3.17 this patch already applied 5607de7 but not yet the next one (18/23) which also has a review, is there another ack needed? > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists