[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABxcv=n7g8c2ePGKgu_0Y35iearcRoAj9ZH5jDWY9nE+1uUKnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:12:03 +0200
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>
To: "Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>,
Marek Belisko <marek.belisko@...il.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm: dts: Add gta04a5 model
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller
<hns@...delico.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>> So what's the conclusion? Are changes needed to this patch
>> series or not?
>
> I advocate that no changes are needed.
>
I agree with Dr. H. Nikolaus on this regard. A DeviceTree should be a
description of the hardware and if two hardware platforms differs,
then we need two different DTS.
Lately I'm seeing some attempts to abuse u-boot's fdt command, u-boot
should only modify the strictly necessary like the /chosen branch.
Allowing u-boot to mangle the FDT before passing to the kernel just to
avoid some DT duplication doesn't sound like a good idea IMHO.
> BR,
> Nikolaus
>
> --
Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists