lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:59:10 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <>
To:	Vincent Guittot <>
Cc:	Rik van Riel <>,
	linux-kernel <>,
	Michael Neuling <>,
	Ingo Molnar <>,,,,
	Nicolas Pitre <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: fix and clean up calculate_imbalance

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:04:50AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > In situations where all the domains are overloaded, or where only the
> > busiest domain is overloaded, that code is also superfluous, since
> > the normal env->imbalance calculation will figure out how much to move.
> > Remove the load_above_capacity calculation.
> IMHO, we should not remove that part which is used by prefer_sibling
> Originally, we had 2 type of busiest group: overloaded or imbalanced.
> You add a new one which has only a avg_load higher than other so you
> should handle this new case and keep the other ones unchanged

Right, so we want that code for overloaded -> overloaded migrations such
as not to cause idle cpus in an attempt to balance things. Idle cpus are
worse than imbalance.

But in case of overloaded/imb -> !overloaded migrations we can allow it,
and in fact want to allow it in order to balance idle cpus.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists