linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] FS-Cache: Timeout for releasepage()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 29 Jul 2014 11:35:24 -0400
From:	Milosz Tanski <milosz@...in.com>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	"linux-cachefs@...hat.com" <linux-cachefs@...hat.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
	Shantanu Goel <sgoel01@...oo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] FS-Cache: Timeout for releasepage()

Originally I was planning doing something with that (a debug message)
but I decided against it and forgot to remove it.

Neil Brown came up with a very similar solution that he posted as I
was developing my own. His patch might be a better candidate.

- M

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:32 AM, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> Milosz Tanski <milosz@...in.com> wrote:
>
>> +bool relase_page_wait_timeout(struct fscache_cookie *cookie, struct page *page
>
> I presume you mean "release_page_wait_timeout".
>
> Also, the new function returns a value which you then ignore.  Should you do
> something with it?
>
> David



-- 
Milosz Tanski
CTO
16 East 34th Street, 15th floor
New York, NY 10016

p: 646-253-9055
e: milosz@...in.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/