[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140729192555.GB6308@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 21:25:55 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>, hpa@...or.com,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] x86: Split syscall_trace_enter into two phases
On 07/28, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> +long syscall_trace_enter_phase2(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 arch,
> + unsigned long phase1_result)
> +{
> + long ret = 0;
> + u32 work = ACCESS_ONCE(current_thread_info()->flags) &
> + _TIF_WORK_SYSCALL_ENTRY;
> +
> + BUG_ON(regs != task_pt_regs(current));
>
> /*
> * If we stepped into a sysenter/syscall insn, it trapped in
> @@ -1463,17 +1569,20 @@ long syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
> * do_debug() and we need to set it again to restore the user
> * state. If we entered on the slow path, TF was already set.
> */
> - if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP))
> + if (work & _TIF_SINGLESTEP)
> regs->flags |= X86_EFLAGS_TF;
This is minor, I won't argue, but this can be moved into phase1(), afaics.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists