[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140729215536.GC14520@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 23:55:37 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] smp: Fast path check on IPI list
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 02:07:39PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 07:37:31PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > When we enqueue a remote irq work, we trigger the same IPI as those
> > raised by smp_call_function_*() family.
> >
> > So when we receive such IPI, we check both irq_work and smp_call_function
> > queues. Thus if we trigger a remote irq work, we'll likely find the
> > smp_call_function queue empty unless we collide with concurrent enqueuers
> > but the probability is low.
> >
> > Meanwhile, checking the smp_call_function queue can be costly because
> > we use llist_del_all() which relies on cmpxchg().
>
> xchg()
It's still costly though as it's an atomic read/write with full barrier. I'll
update the comment meanwhile.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists