linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: print debug values in Kib not MB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53D82857.4020806@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 29 Jul 2014 19:03:51 -0400
From:	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	lszubowi@...hat.com, Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: print debug values in Kib not MB



On 07/29/2014 07:01 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 03:42:55PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
>> If Prarit is going to implement this suggested reverse memparse() ...
> 
> The only meaningful argument about the formatting here IMO is what
> people staring at this output are going to understand from it.
> 
> And since those people most often tend to be the poor souls dealing with
> UEFI, we should ask them whether this needs fixing and if so, how.
> 

... I did do a get_maintainers.pl on this before sending it.  Did I miss someone
or some list? :(

P.

> That's it.
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/