[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140730095642.5f68e01d@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:56:42 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
Hi all,
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:45:22 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c:743:6: error: conflicting types for 'update_vsyscall_old'
> void update_vsyscall_old(struct timespec *wall_time, struct timespec *wtm,
> ^
> In file included from arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c:77:0:
> include/linux/timekeeper_internal.h:114:13: note: previous declaration of 'update_vsyscall_old' was here
> extern void update_vsyscall_old(struct timespec *ts, struct timespec *wtm,
> ^
>
> Caused by commit 4a0e637738f0 ("clocksource: Get rid of cycle_last").
>
> I have used the tip tree from next-20140724 for today.
Ping?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists