[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140730014808.078846511@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 18:48:41 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Qiang Huang <h.huangqiang@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.4 10/10] mm: kmemleak: avoid false negatives on vmalloced objects
3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
commit 7f88f88f83ed609650a01b18572e605ea50cd163 upstream.
Commit 248ac0e1943a ("mm/vmalloc: remove guard page from between vmap
blocks") had the side effect of making vmap_area.va_end member point to
the next vmap_area.va_start. This was creating an artificial reference
to vmalloc'ed objects and kmemleak was rarely reporting vmalloc() leaks.
This patch marks the vmap_area containing pointers explicitly and
reduces the min ref_count to 2 as vm_struct still contains a reference
to the vmalloc'ed object. The kmemleak add_scan_area() function has
been improved to allow a SIZE_MAX argument covering the rest of the
object (for simpler calling sites).
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
[hq: Backported to 3.4: Adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Qiang Huang <h.huangqiang@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
mm/kmemleak.c | 4 +++-
mm/vmalloc.c | 14 ++++++++++----
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/kmemleak.c
+++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
@@ -750,7 +750,9 @@ static void add_scan_area(unsigned long
}
spin_lock_irqsave(&object->lock, flags);
- if (ptr + size > object->pointer + object->size) {
+ if (size == SIZE_MAX) {
+ size = object->pointer + object->size - ptr;
+ } else if (ptr + size > object->pointer + object->size) {
kmemleak_warn("Scan area larger than object 0x%08lx\n", ptr);
dump_object_info(object);
kmem_cache_free(scan_area_cache, area);
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -349,6 +349,12 @@ static struct vmap_area *alloc_vmap_area
if (unlikely(!va))
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ /*
+ * Only scan the relevant parts containing pointers to other objects
+ * to avoid false negatives.
+ */
+ kmemleak_scan_area(&va->rb_node, SIZE_MAX, gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK);
+
retry:
spin_lock(&vmap_area_lock);
/*
@@ -1669,11 +1675,11 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_range(unsigned long
insert_vmalloc_vmlist(area);
/*
- * A ref_count = 3 is needed because the vm_struct and vmap_area
- * structures allocated in the __get_vm_area_node() function contain
- * references to the virtual address of the vmalloc'ed block.
+ * A ref_count = 2 is needed because vm_struct allocated in
+ * __get_vm_area_node() contains a reference to the virtual address of
+ * the vmalloc'ed block.
*/
- kmemleak_alloc(addr, real_size, 3, gfp_mask);
+ kmemleak_alloc(addr, real_size, 2, gfp_mask);
return addr;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists