linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 3/5] regulator: core: Only apply constraints if available on list voltage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:42:53 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
Cc:	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Yuvaraj Kumar C D <yuvaraj.cd@...il.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/5] regulator: core: Only apply constraints if available
 on list voltage

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:49:25AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 07/29/2014 07:18 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I would also expect any regulator where the supplied devices are able to
> > vary the voltage to explicitly provide a constraint even if the
> > implementation is done in a parent regulator.  There may be constraints
> > on the child supply which aren't directly present on the parent supply
> > and can be ignored if the child supply is turned off.

> Agreed, if I explicitly set the voltage constraints on the child supply then
> this patch is indeed not needed.

We will, however, need some code to pass the child supply constraints on
to the parent.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)