[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140730112414.GJ12239@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:24:14 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM/ARM64: don't enter kgdb when userspace executes a
kgdb break instruction.
Hello,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:12:45AM +0100, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> The kgdb breakpoint hooks (kgdb_brk_fn and kgdb_compiled_brk_fn) should only be
> entered when a kgdb break instruction is executed from the kernel. Otherwise,
> if kgdb is enabled, a userspace program can cause the kernel to drop into the
> debugger by executing either KGDB_BREAKINST or KGDB_COMPILED_BREAK on ARM, or
> brk #KGDB_{DYN,COMPILED}_DGB_BRK_IMM on ARM64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>
> ---
> The following program reproduces the fixed problem on ARM:
> .globl _start
> _start:
> udf #65006 @ KGDB_BREAKINST
>
> And on ARM64:
> .globl _start
> _start:
> brk #0x400 @ KGDB_DYN_DGB_BRK_IMM
>
> arch/arm/kernel/kgdb.c | 4 ++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h | 4 +++-
> arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c | 4 ++++
> 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Whilst this sounds like a worrying problem, I've failed to reproduce it
on arm64. Executing a brk instruction with either KGDB_DYN_DGB_BRK_IMM or
KDBG_COMPILED_DBG_BRK_IMM immediates from userspace results in a SIGTRAP being
delivered, assumedly because kgdb_handle_exception simply returns when kgdb
isn't active.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
> index 6e9b5b3..e1d27ce 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
> @@ -105,8 +105,10 @@ void unregister_step_hook(struct step_hook *hook);
>
> struct break_hook {
> struct list_head node;
> - u32 esr_val;
> u32 esr_mask;
> + u32 esr_val;
> + u64 pstate_mask;
> + u64 pstate_val;
The following (totally untested) diff is simpler for arm64, but again, I'm
not sure we even have a problem here.
On which systems have you managed to reproduce this and how?
Will
--->8
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
index a7fb874b595e..fe5b94078d82 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
@@ -315,20 +315,20 @@ static int brk_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
{
siginfo_t info;
- if (call_break_hook(regs, esr) == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
- return 0;
+ if (user_mode(regs)) {
+ info = (siginfo_t) {
+ .si_signo = SIGTRAP,
+ .si_errno = 0,
+ .si_code = TRAP_BRKPT,
+ .si_addr = (void __user *)instruction_pointer(regs),
+ };
- if (!user_mode(regs))
+ force_sig_info(SIGTRAP, &info, current);
+ } else if (call_break_hook(regs, esr) != DBG_HOOK_HANDLED) {
+ pr_warning("Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1\n");
return -EFAULT;
+ }
- info = (siginfo_t) {
- .si_signo = SIGTRAP,
- .si_errno = 0,
- .si_code = TRAP_BRKPT,
- .si_addr = (void __user *)instruction_pointer(regs),
- };
-
- force_sig_info(SIGTRAP, &info, current);
return 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists