[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53D8DCC5.7050205@mellanox.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:53:41 +0300
From: Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>
To: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
CC: Jérôme Glisse <j.glisse@...il.com>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <mgorman@...e.de>, <hpa@...or.com>,
<peterz@...raread.org>, <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
<aarcange@...hat.com>, <riel@...hat.com>, <jweiner@...hat.com>,
Sherry Cheung <SCheung@...dia.com>,
Subhash Gutti <sgutti@...dia.com>,
Mark Hairgrove <mhairgrove@...dia.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Jatin Kumar <jakumar@...dia.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagig@...lanox.com>,
Shachar Raindel <raindel@...lanox.com>,
Liran Liss <liranl@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] hmm: heterogeneous memory management v3
On 28/07/2014 18:39, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 03:27:14PM +0300, Haggai Eran wrote:
>> On 14/06/2014 03:48, Jérôme Glisse wrote:> From: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
>>>
>>> Motivation:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> The aim of the heterogeneous memory management is to provide a common API that
>>> can be use by any such devices in order to mirror process address. The hmm code
>>> provide an unique entry point and interface itself with the core mm code of the
>>> linux kernel avoiding duplicate implementation and shielding device driver code
>>> from core mm code.
>>>
>>> Moreover, hmm also intend to provide support for migrating memory to device
>>> private memory, allowing device to work on its own fast local memory. The hmm
>>> code would be responsible to intercept cpu page fault on migrated range of and
>>> to migrate it back to system memory allowing cpu to resume its access to the
>>> memory.
>>>
>>> Another feature hmm intend to provide is support for atomic operation for the
>>> device even if the bus linking the device and the cpu do not have any such
>>> capabilities.
>>>
>>> We expect that graphic processing unit and network interface to be among the
>>> first users of such api.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry I'm only now replying to this email. I'm hoping my feedback is still relevant :)
>>
>
> Any feedback is welcome.
>
>> At Mellanox we are currently working on similar technology for avoiding
>> pinning memory for RDMA [1]. We currently have our own MMU notifier code
>> but once the HMM makes it into the kernel I hope we will be able to use it.
>>
>> I have a couple of questions below:
>>
>>>
>>> Hardware requirement:
>>>
>>> Because hmm is intended to be use by device driver there are minimum features
>>> requirement for the hardware mmu :
>>> - hardware have its own page table per process (can be share btw != devices)
>>> - hardware mmu support page fault and suspend execution until the page fault
>>> is serviced by hmm code. The page fault must also trigger some form of
>>> interrupt so that hmm code can be call by the device driver.
>>> - hardware must support at least read only mapping (otherwise it can not
>>> access read only range of the process address space).
>>>
>>> For better memory management it is highly recommanded that the device also
>>> support the following features :
>>> - hardware mmu set access bit in its page table on memory access (like cpu).
>>> - hardware page table can be updated from cpu or through a fast path.
>>> - hardware provide advanced statistic over which range of memory it access
>>> the most.
>>> - hardware differentiate atomic memory access from regular access allowing
>>> to support atomic operation even on platform that do not have atomic
>>> support with there bus link with the device.
>>>
>>> Implementation:
>>>
>>> ...
>>
>>> +
>>> +/* struct hmm_event - used to serialize change to overlapping range of address.
>>> + *
>>> + * @list: List of pending|in progress event.
>>> + * @faddr: First address (inclusive) for the range this event affect.
>>> + * @laddr: Last address (exclusive) for the range this event affect.
>>> + * @iaddr: First invalid address.
>>> + * @fences: List of device fences associated with this event.
>>> + * @etype: Event type (munmap, migrate, truncate, ...).
>>> + * @backoff: Should this event backoff ie a new event render it obsolete.
>>> + */
>>> +struct hmm_event {
>>> + struct list_head list;
>>> + unsigned long faddr;
>>> + unsigned long laddr;
>>> + unsigned long iaddr;
>>> + struct list_head fences;
>>> + enum hmm_etype etype;
>>> + bool backoff;
>>
>> The backoff field is always being set to false in this patch, right? Is
>> it intended to be used only for device page migration?
>
> Correct, migration to remote memory might happen concurently with other
> memory event that render migration pointless.
>
>
>>
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +/* hmm_device - Each device driver must register one and only one hmm_device.
>>> + *
>>> + * The hmm_device is the link btw hmm and each device driver.
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +/* struct hmm_device_operations - hmm device operation callback
>>> + */
>>> +struct hmm_device_ops {
>>> + /* device_destroy - free hmm_device (call when refcount drop to 0).
>>> + *
>>> + * @device: The device hmm specific structure.
>>> + */
>>> + void (*device_destroy)(struct hmm_device *device);
>>> +
>>> + /* mirror_release() - device must stop using the address space.
>>> + *
>>> + * @mirror: The mirror that link process address space with the device.
>>> + *
>>> + * Called when as result of hmm_mirror_unregister or when mm is being
>>> + * destroy.
>>> + *
>>> + * It's illegal for the device to call any hmm helper function after
>>> + * this call back. The device driver must kill any pending device
>>> + * thread and wait for completion of all of them.
>>> + *
>>> + * Note that even after this callback returns the device driver might
>>> + * get call back from hmm. Callback will stop only once mirror_destroy
>>> + * is call.
>>> + */
>>> + void (*mirror_release)(struct hmm_mirror *hmm_mirror);
>>> +
>>> + /* mirror_destroy - free hmm_mirror (call when refcount drop to 0).
>>> + *
>>> + * @mirror: The mirror that link process address space with the device.
>>> + */
>>> + void (*mirror_destroy)(struct hmm_mirror *mirror);
>>> +
>>> + /* fence_wait() - to wait on device driver fence.
>>> + *
>>> + * @fence: The device driver fence struct.
>>> + * Returns: 0 on success,-EIO on error, -EAGAIN to wait again.
>>> + *
>>> + * Called when hmm want to wait for all operations associated with a
>>> + * fence to complete (including device cache flush if the event mandate
>>> + * it).
>>> + *
>>> + * Device driver must free fence and associated resources if it returns
>>> + * something else thant -EAGAIN. On -EAGAIN the fence must not be free
>>> + * as hmm will call back again.
>>> + *
>>> + * Return error if scheduled operation failed or if need to wait again.
>>> + * -EIO Some input/output error with the device.
>>> + * -EAGAIN The fence not yet signaled, hmm reschedule waiting thread.
>>> + *
>>> + * All other return value trigger warning and are transformed to -EIO.
>>> + */
>>> + int (*fence_wait)(struct hmm_fence *fence);
>>> +
>>> + /* fence_destroy() - destroy fence structure.
>>> + *
>>> + * @fence: Fence structure to destroy.
>>> + *
>>> + * Called when all reference on a fence are gone.
>>> + */
>>> + void (*fence_destroy)(struct hmm_fence *fence);
>>> +
>>> + /* update() - update device mmu for a range of address.
>>> + *
>>> + * @mirror: The mirror that link process address space with the device.
>>> + * @vma: The vma into which the update is taking place.
>>> + * @faddr: First address in range (inclusive).
>>> + * @laddr: Last address in range (exclusive).
>>> + * @etype: The type of memory event (unmap, read only, ...).
>>> + * Returns: Valid fence ptr or NULL on success otherwise ERR_PTR.
>>> + *
>>> + * Called to update device mmu permission/usage for a range of address.
>>> + * The event type provide the nature of the update :
>>> + * - range is no longer valid (munmap).
>>> + * - range protection changes (mprotect, COW, ...).
>>> + * - range is unmapped (swap, reclaim, page migration, ...).
>>> + * - ...
>>> + *
>>> + * Any event that block further write to the memory must also trigger a
>>> + * device cache flush and everything has to be flush to local memory by
>>> + * the time the wait callback return (if this callback returned a fence
>>> + * otherwise everything must be flush by the time the callback return).
>>> + *
>>> + * Device must properly call set_page_dirty on any page the device did
>>> + * write to since last call to update.
>>> + *
>>> + * The driver should return a fence pointer or NULL on success. Device
>>> + * driver should return fence and delay wait for the operation to the
>>> + * febce wait callback. Returning a fence allow hmm to batch update to
>>> + * several devices and delay wait on those once they all have scheduled
>>> + * the update.
>>> + *
>>> + * Device driver must not fail lightly, any failure result in device
>>> + * process being kill.
>>> + *
>>> + * Return fence or NULL on success, error value otherwise :
>>> + * -ENOMEM Not enough memory for performing the operation.
>>> + * -EIO Some input/output error with the device.
>>> + *
>>> + * All other return value trigger warning and are transformed to -EIO.
>>> + */
>>> + struct hmm_fence *(*update)(struct hmm_mirror *mirror,
>>> + struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> + unsigned long faddr,
>>> + unsigned long laddr,
>>> + enum hmm_etype etype);
>>> +
>>> + /* fault() - fault range of address on the device mmu.
>>> + *
>>> + * @mirror: The mirror that link process address space with the device.
>>> + * @faddr: First address in range (inclusive).
>>> + * @laddr: Last address in range (exclusive).
>>> + * @pfns: Array of pfn for the range (each of the pfn is valid).
>>> + * @fault: The fault structure provided by device driver.
>>> + * Returns: 0 on success, error value otherwise.
>>> + *
>>> + * Called to give the device driver each of the pfn backing a range of
>>> + * address. It is only call as a result of a call to hmm_mirror_fault.
>>> + *
>>> + * Note that the pfns array content is only valid for the duration of
>>> + * the callback. Once the device driver callback return further memory
>>> + * activities might invalidate the value of the pfns array. The device
>>> + * driver will be inform of such changes through the update callback.
>>> + *
>>> + * Allowed return value are :
>>> + * -ENOMEM Not enough memory for performing the operation.
>>> + * -EIO Some input/output error with the device.
>>> + *
>>> + * Device driver must not fail lightly, any failure result in device
>>> + * process being kill.
>>> + *
>>> + * Return error if scheduled operation failed. Valid value :
>>> + * -ENOMEM Not enough memory for performing the operation.
>>> + * -EIO Some input/output error with the device.
>>> + *
>>> + * All other return value trigger warning and are transformed to -EIO.
>>> + */
>>> + int (*fault)(struct hmm_mirror *mirror,
>>> + unsigned long faddr,
>>> + unsigned long laddr,
>>> + pte_t *ptep,
>>> + struct hmm_event *event);
>>> +};
>>
>> I noticed that the device will receive PFNs as a result of a page fault.
>> I assume most devices will also need to call dma_map_page on the
>> physical address to get a bus address to use. Do you think it would make
>> sense to handle mapping and unmapping pages inside HMM?
>
> We thought about this and this is not an easy task, on simple computer all
> PCI/PCIE device will share the same iommu domain as they are behind the
> same bridge/iommu. But on more complex architecture there can be several
> iommu and each device can be behind different iommu domain.
>
> So this would mean a 1:N relationship btw page and domains it is use on.
> Which would require non trivial data structure (ie something with a list
> or alike) with the memory consumption that goes with it.
>
> So i think on that front it is better to have the device driver do the
> dma_map_page and use the value which it stores inside its device page table
> to do the dma_unmap_page when necessary.
>
> Of course if you have ideas on how to solve the multi-domains and each
> device possibly behind different domain, i welcome anything on that front.
I was thinking that if the alternative is that each driver maps its own
pages, we can share that code by storing the dma addresses as part of
each hmm_mirror. Sharing the code also provides the opportunity to have
a single dma address per page in the case where there's only one domain.
>
>>
>>> ...
>>
>>> +
>>> +static void hmm_update_mirrors(struct hmm *hmm,
>>> + struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> + struct hmm_event *event)
>>> +{
>>> + struct hmm_mirror *mirror;
>>> + struct hmm_fence *fence = NULL, *tmp;
>>> + int ticket;
>>> +
>>> +retry:
>>> + ticket = srcu_read_lock(&srcu);
>>> + /* Because of retry we might already have scheduled some mirror
>>> + * skip those.
>>> + */
>>> + mirror = list_first_entry(&hmm->mirrors,
>>> + struct hmm_mirror,
>>> + mlist);
>>> + mirror = fence ? fence->mirror : mirror;
>>> + list_for_each_entry_continue(mirror, &hmm->mirrors, mlist) {
>>> + struct hmm_device *device = mirror->device;
>>> +
>>> + fence = device->ops->update(mirror, vma, event->faddr,
>>> + event->laddr, event->etype);
>>> + if (fence) {
>>> + if (IS_ERR(fence)) {
>>> + srcu_read_unlock(&srcu, ticket);
>>> + hmm_mirror_cleanup(mirror);
>>> + goto retry;
>>> + }
>>> + kref_init(&fence->kref);
>>> + fence->mirror = mirror;
>>> + list_add_tail(&fence->list, &event->fences);
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> + srcu_read_unlock(&srcu, ticket);
>>> +
>>> + if (!fence)
>>> + /* Nothing to wait for. */
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + io_schedule();
>>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(fence, tmp, &event->fences, list) {
>>> + struct hmm_device *device;
>>> + int r;
>>> +
>>> + mirror = fence->mirror;
>>> + device = mirror->device;
>>> +
>>> + r = hmm_device_fence_wait(device, fence);
>>> + if (r)
>>> + hmm_mirror_cleanup(mirror);
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +
>>
>> It seems like the code ignores any error the update operation may
>> return, except for cleaning up the mirror. If I understand correctly,
>> having an error here would mean that the device cannot invalidate the
>> pages it has access to, and they cannot be released. Isn't that right?
>>
>
> The function name is probably not explicit but hmm_mirror_cleanup is like
> a hmm_mirror_destroy. It will ask the device driver to stop using the address
> space ie any update failure from the device driver is a fatal failure for
> hmm and hmm consider that the mirroring must stops.
>
>>> ...
>>
>>> +
>>> +/* hmm_mirror - per device mirroring functions.
>>> + *
>>> + * Each device that mirror a process has a uniq hmm_mirror struct. A process
>>> + * can be mirror by several devices at the same time.
>>> + *
>>> + * Below are all the functions and there helpers use by device driver to mirror
>>> + * the process address space. Those functions either deals with updating the
>>> + * device page table (through hmm callback). Or provide helper functions use by
>>> + * the device driver to fault in range of memory in the device page table.
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +static void hmm_mirror_cleanup(struct hmm_mirror *mirror)
>>> +{
>>> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>>> + struct hmm_device *device = mirror->device;
>>> + struct hmm_event event;
>>> + struct hmm *hmm = mirror->hmm;
>>> +
>>> + spin_lock(&hmm->lock);
>>> + if (mirror->dead) {
>>> + spin_unlock(&hmm->lock);
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> + mirror->dead = true;
>>> + list_del(&mirror->mlist);
>>> + spin_unlock(&hmm->lock);
>>> + synchronize_srcu(&srcu);
>>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mirror->mlist);
>>> +
>>> + event.etype = HMM_UNREGISTER;
>>> + event.faddr = 0UL;
>>> + event.laddr = -1L;
>>> + vma = find_vma_intersection(hmm->mm, event.faddr, event.laddr);
>>> + for (; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) {
>>> + struct hmm_fence *fence;
>>> +
>>> + fence = device->ops->update(mirror, vma, vma->vm_start,
>>> + vma->vm_end, event.etype);
>>> + if (fence && !IS_ERR(fence)) {
>>> + kref_init(&fence->kref);
>>> + fence->mirror = mirror;
>>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fence->list);
>>> + hmm_device_fence_wait(device, fence);
>>> + }
>>
>> Here too the code ignores any error from update.
>
> Like said above, this function actualy terminate the device driver mirror
> and thus any further error is ignored. This have been change in lastest
> version of the patchset. But idea stays the same any error on update from
> a device driver terminate the mirror.
Okay. I guess the driver should handle this internally if there's such a
critical error. It can reset its device or something like that.
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~glisse/linux/log/?h=hmm
Thanks, I'll take a look.
Haggai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists