[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53D9197C.2050000@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 19:12:44 +0300
From: Boaz Harrosh <openosd@...il.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: willy@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 04/22] Change direct_access calling convention
On 07/30/2014 07:03 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
<>
>> +long bdev_direct_access(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
>> + void **addr, unsigned long *pfn, long size)
>> +{
>> + const struct block_device_operations *ops = bdev->bd_disk->fops;
>> + if (!ops->direct_access)
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> You need to check alignment on PAGE_SIZE since this API requires it, do
> to pfn defined to a page_number.
>
> (Unless you want to define another output-param like page_offset.
> but this exercise can be left to the caller)
>
> You also need to check against the partition boundary. so something like:
>
> + if (sector & (PAGE_SECTORS-1))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (unlikely(sector + size > part_nr_sects_read(bdev->bd_part)))
Off course I was wrong here size is in bytes not in sectors. Which points
out that maybe this API needs to be in sectors.
[Actually it needs to be in pages both size and offset, because of return of
pfn, but its your call.]
Anyway my code above needs to be fixed with
(size + 512 -1) / 512
Thanks
Boaz
> + return -ERANGE;
>
> Then perhaps you can remove that check from drivers
>
>> + return ops->direct_access(bdev, sector + get_start_sect(bdev), addr,
>> + pfn, size);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bdev_direct_access);
<>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists