[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140730230302.GA22779@node.dhcp.inet.fi>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 02:03:02 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Michael L. Semon" <mlsemon35@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, jason.low2@...com,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cred_guard_mutex vs seq_file::lock [was: Re: 3.14.0+/x86:
lockdep and mutexes not getting along]
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 01:31:30AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> I don't know why we allow "chmod +x" on some proc files, notably net-related.
> Is it a bug?
# ls -l /proc/{1,157}/net/packet
-r--r--r-- 1 root 0 0 Jul 30 23:01 /proc/1/net/packet
-r--r--r-- 1 root 0 0 Jul 30 23:01 /proc/157/net/packet
# chmod +x /proc/157/net/packet
# ls -l /proc/{1,157}/net/packet
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root 0 0 Jul 30 23:02 /proc/1/net/packet
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root 0 0 Jul 30 23:02 /proc/157/net/packet
Ouch.. Or is it expected?
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists