linux-kernel - Re: [LKP] [sched/numa] a43455a1d57: +94.1% proc-vmstat.numa_hint_faults

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140731024254.3dad1156@annuminas.surriel.com>
Date:	Thu, 31 Jul 2014 02:42:54 -0400
From:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To:	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...org,
	jhladky@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [LKP] [sched/numa] a43455a1d57: +94.1%
 proc-vmstat.numa_hint_faults_local

On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:04:54 +0800
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:25:03AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On 07/29/2014 10:14 PM, Aaron Lu wrote:

> > >> +#define NUMA_SCALE 1024
> > >> +#define NUMA_MOVE_THRESH (5 * NUMA_SCALE / 100)
> > 
> > It would be good to see if changing NUMA_MOVE_THRESH to
> > (NUMA_SCALE / 8) does the trick.

FWIW, running with NUMA_MOVE_THRESH set to (NUMA_SCALE / 8)
seems to resolve the SPECjbb2005 threshold on my system.

I will run some more sanity tests later today...

-- 
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/