linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <86mwbpwqgn.fsf@arm.com>
Date:	Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:30:32 +0100
From:	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To:	Christoffer Dall <cdall@...columbia.edu>
Cc:	Christoffer Dall <christofferdall@...istofferdall.dk>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	"linux-next\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with Linus' tree

On Thu, Jul 31 2014 at 03:23:47 PM, Christoffer Dall <cdall@...columbia.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 01:15:40PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 31 2014 at 12:53:03 pm BST, Christoffer Dall
>> <christofferdall@...istofferdall.dk> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Christoffer,
>> 
>> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell
>> > <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> >
>> >     Hi all,
>> >    
>> >     Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in
>> >     virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c between commit 63afbe7a0ac1 ("kvm: arm64: vgic: fix
>> >     hyp panic with 64k pages on juno platform") from Linus' tree and commit
>> >     8f186d522c69 ("KVM: ARM: vgic: split GICv2 backend from the main vgic
>> >     code") and others from the kvm-arm tree.
>> >    
>> >     I fixed it up (the latter extensively rewrites the function, so I just
>> >     used that) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action is required).
>> >
>> > Hmm that doesn't look correct, the checks  for
>> > PAGE_ALIGNED(vcpu_res.start) and PAGE_ALIGNED(resource_size(vcpu_res))
>> > still need to be enforced for both vgic-v2 and vgic-v3.  How do we
>> > provide a correct fix for Linux-next?
>> 
>> I've provided a resolution for GICv2 in a separate email. For GICv3, I
>> have the following patch in my tree, which can be added at a later time.
>> 
> The GICv3 build fix and the GICv3 fix you provided here are now both
> in kvmarm/next.

Excellent, thanks Christoffer.

Cheers,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/