[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53DA6171.30100@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:32:01 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>
CC: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] of: Add Tegra124 EMC bindings
On 07/31/2014 05:05 AM, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
> On 31/07/14 13:48, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
>>>
>>> I see that the TRM implies the whole 4-bit field is RAM code, rather
>>> than there being 2 separate 2-bit fields for RAM code and boot device
>>> code. Can you please file a bug against the TRM to document this
>>> correctly? (The details of which bits are which are visible on the
>>> Jetson TK1 schematics for example).
>>
>> Yes, I'll file a bug.
>
> On a closer look, the downstream kernel has been recently updated to
> consider the whole 4 bits the ram code. The relevant bug also has a
> comment mentioning that starting from T124, the whole 4 bits is
> considered the RAM code.
That's odd. Given the structure of the BCT hasn't change, I suspect
that's a documentation bug that's propagated elsewhere. Can you send me
the bug number internally, and I'll take a look? Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists