linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] efi-bgrt: Add error handling; inform the user when ignoring the BGRT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140731161133.GA12663@cloud>
Date:	Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:11:33 -0700
From:	josh@...htriplett.org
To:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
Cc:	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Srihari Vijayaraghavan <linux.bug.reporting@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi-bgrt: Add error handling; inform the user when
 ignoring the BGRT

On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 11:31:10AM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul, at 12:23:32PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > @@ -61,14 +81,18 @@ void __init efi_bgrt_init(void)
> >  		early_iounmap(image, sizeof(bmp_header));
> >  	bgrt_image_size = bmp_header.size;
> >  
> > -	bgrt_image = kmalloc(bgrt_image_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > -	if (!bgrt_image)
> > +	bgrt_image = kmalloc(bgrt_image_size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
> > +	if (!bgrt_image) {
> > +		pr_err("Ignoring BGRT: failed to allocate memory for image (wanted %zu bytes)\n",
> > +		       bgrt_image_size);
> >  		return;
> 
> I'm not sure that using __GFP_NOWARN is the right thing to do here. If
> for some reason we can't handle the BGRT image we should include checks
> in the BGRT code, rather than relying on the page-allocation machinery
> to save us.
> 
> Let's just use an explicit limit on the size of the BGRT image we're
> willing to handle.

I started to add an explicit limit, but any reasonable limit (large
enough for modern screens) would be large enough that there's still a
non-trivial possibility of allocation failure.  And I think it makes
sense for BGRT image allocation to be non-fatal and minimally noisy
(just a single-line error, not a scary-looking allocation warning),
considering the highly optional and cosmetic nature of BGRT.  So, I
believe __GFP_NOWARN makes sense.

- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/