[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140731163524.GT4703@rric.localhost>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 18:35:24 +0200
From: Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Radha Mohan Chintakuntla <rchintakuntla@...ium.com>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@...ium.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] arm64, thunder: Add initial dts for Cavium Thunder
SoC
On 31.07.14 10:22:19, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On 30.07.14 11:37:38, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 04:06:31PM +0100, Robert Richter wrote:
> >> >> From: Radha Mohan Chintakuntla <rchintakuntla@...ium.com>
> >
> >> >> +/ {
> >> >> + model = "Cavium ThunderX CN88XX Family";
> >> >> + compatible = "cavium,thunder-88xx";
> >> >
> >> > Please don't use wildcards in compatible strings. Give this an absolute
> >> > name, and override as necessary.
> >
> > The naming 88xx refers to the processor family and arn't actually
> > wildcards. In the future we might need another dts file for 87xx, but
> > so far all SoCs of 88xx family should use the same dts files. In this
> > sense the naming is very specific.
>
> Yes, but each implementation can have its own errata. You might not
> need to distinguish them now, but you could in the future.
>
> However, if the family is really all the same die and different parts
> are just marketing, then the name is fine. Or if you can easily probe
> the exact part and revision it's probably fine.
Yes, this relates to the same soc.
>
> >
> >
> >> >> + cpus {
> >> >> + #address-cells = <2>;
> >> >> + #size-cells = <0>;
> >> >> +
> >> >> + cpu@000 {
> >> >> + device_type = "cpu";
> >> >> + compatible = "cavium,thunder", "arm,armv8";
> >> >> + reg = <0x0 0x000>;
> >> >> + enable-method = "psci";
> >> >> + };
> >> >
> >> > Just to check: both the SoC and CPU are called thunder?
> >
> > The soc is called thunder-88xx, the cpu thunder. E.g. an 87xx soc will
> > have the same core in which is thunder.
>
> And the next version of the core would be called something else?
> thunder-v2? lightning? As long as they are distinguishable they should
> be fine.
Same here, the name relates to the same core.
-Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists