[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140731165804.GB16800@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 18:58:04 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux MIPS Mailing List <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] x86,entry: Only call user_exit if TIF_NOHZ
On 07/31, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 07/31, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 06:42:46PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > >
> > > And if we change this, then the code above becomes racy. The state of
> > > TIF_XYZ can be changed right after the check. OK, it is racy anyway ;)
> > > but still this adds more confusion.
> >
> > No because all running tasks have this flag set when context tracking is
> > enabled. And context tracking can't be disabled on runtime.
>
> Yes, yes, please note that I said "if we change this".
And "it is racy anyway" connects to the problems we discuss in another
thread.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists