[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140731170108.GE12697@cloud>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:01:08 -0700
From: josh@...htriplett.org
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, bobby.prani@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 05/10] rcutorture: Add torture tests
for RCU-tasks
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 05:39:37PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> This commit adds torture tests for RCU-tasks. It also fixes a bug that
> would segfault for an RCU flavor lacking a callback-barrier function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Seems reasonable; however, you could also set .cb_barrier =
synchronize_rcu_tasks and drop rcu_barrier_tasks.
Either way:
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
> include/linux/rcupdate.h | 1 +
> kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index 17c7e25c38be..ecb2198849e0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ enum rcutorture_type {
> RCU_FLAVOR,
> RCU_BH_FLAVOR,
> RCU_SCHED_FLAVOR,
> + RCU_TASKS_FLAVOR,
> SRCU_FLAVOR,
> INVALID_RCU_FLAVOR
> };
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> index febe07062ac5..6d12ab6675bc 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> @@ -602,6 +602,42 @@ static struct rcu_torture_ops sched_ops = {
> };
>
> /*
> + * Definitions for RCU-tasks torture testing.
> + */
> +
> +static int tasks_torture_read_lock(void)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void tasks_torture_read_unlock(int idx)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static void rcu_tasks_torture_deferred_free(struct rcu_torture *p)
> +{
> + call_rcu_tasks(&p->rtort_rcu, rcu_torture_cb);
> +}
> +
> +static struct rcu_torture_ops tasks_ops = {
> + .ttype = RCU_TASKS_FLAVOR,
> + .init = rcu_sync_torture_init,
> + .readlock = tasks_torture_read_lock,
> + .read_delay = rcu_read_delay, /* just reuse rcu's version. */
> + .readunlock = tasks_torture_read_unlock,
> + .completed = rcu_no_completed,
> + .deferred_free = rcu_tasks_torture_deferred_free,
> + .sync = synchronize_rcu_tasks,
> + .exp_sync = synchronize_rcu_tasks,
> + .call = call_rcu_tasks,
> + .cb_barrier = rcu_barrier_tasks,
> + .fqs = NULL,
> + .stats = NULL,
> + .irq_capable = 1,
> + .name = "tasks"
> +};
> +
> +/*
> * RCU torture priority-boost testing. Runs one real-time thread per
> * CPU for moderate bursts, repeatedly registering RCU callbacks and
> * spinning waiting for them to be invoked. If a given callback takes
> @@ -1295,7 +1331,8 @@ static int rcu_torture_barrier_cbs(void *arg)
> if (atomic_dec_and_test(&barrier_cbs_count))
> wake_up(&barrier_wq);
> } while (!torture_must_stop());
> - cur_ops->cb_barrier();
> + if (cur_ops->cb_barrier != NULL)
> + cur_ops->cb_barrier();
> destroy_rcu_head_on_stack(&rcu);
> torture_kthread_stopping("rcu_torture_barrier_cbs");
> return 0;
> @@ -1534,6 +1571,7 @@ rcu_torture_init(void)
> int firsterr = 0;
> static struct rcu_torture_ops *torture_ops[] = {
> &rcu_ops, &rcu_bh_ops, &rcu_busted_ops, &srcu_ops, &sched_ops,
> + &tasks_ops,
> };
>
> if (!torture_init_begin(torture_type, verbose, &rcutorture_runnable))
> --
> 1.8.1.5
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists