linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add TLS record layer encryption module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 31 Jul 2014 12:59:45 -0700
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	Cristian Stoica <cristian.stoica@...escale.com>,
	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
CC:	davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add TLS record layer encryption module

On 07/29/2014 02:32 AM, Cristian Stoica wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This set of patches introduces support for TLS 1.0 record layer
> encryption/decryption with a corresponding algorithm called
> tls10(hmac(<hash>),cbc(<cipher>)).
> 
> Similarly to authenc.c on which it is based, this module mixes the base
> algorithms in software to produce an algorithm that does record layer
> encryption and decryption for TLS1.0.
> Any combination of hw and sw base algorithms is possible, but the purpose
> is to take advantage of hardware acceleration for TLS record layer offloading
> when hardware acceleration is present.

What is this used for?  AF_ALG?  I find it hard to believe that the
kernel will ever want to use this internally.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/