linux-kernel - [PATCH] swap: remove the struct cpumask has

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1406777421-12830-3-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Thu, 31 Jul 2014 11:30:19 +0800
From:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@...il.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: [PATCH] swap: remove the struct cpumask has_work

It is suggested that cpumask_var_t and alloc_cpumask_var() should be used
instead of struct cpumask.  But I don't want to add this complicity nor
leave this unwelcome "static struct cpumask has_work;", so I just remove
it and use flush_work() to perform on all online drain_work.  flush_work()
performs very quickly on initialized but unused work item, thus we don't
need the struct cpumask has_work for performance.

CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
CC: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
CC: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>
CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
---
 mm/swap.c |   11 ++++-------
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index 9e8e347..bb524ca 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -833,27 +833,24 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct work_struct, lru_add_drain_work);
 void lru_add_drain_all(void)
 {
 	static DEFINE_MUTEX(lock);
-	static struct cpumask has_work;
 	int cpu;
 
 	mutex_lock(&lock);
 	get_online_cpus();
-	cpumask_clear(&has_work);
 
 	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
 		struct work_struct *work = &per_cpu(lru_add_drain_work, cpu);
 
+		INIT_WORK(work, lru_add_drain_per_cpu);
+
 		if (pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_add_pvec, cpu)) ||
 		    pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_rotate_pvecs, cpu)) ||
 		    pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_deactivate_pvecs, cpu)) ||
-		    need_activate_page_drain(cpu)) {
-			INIT_WORK(work, lru_add_drain_per_cpu);
+		    need_activate_page_drain(cpu))
 			schedule_work_on(cpu, work);
-			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &has_work);
-		}
 	}
 
-	for_each_cpu(cpu, &has_work)
+	for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
 		flush_work(&per_cpu(lru_add_drain_work, cpu));
 
 	put_online_cpus();
-- 
1.7.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/